Advertisement

Participant perspectives on a department of surgery faculty mentoring program

Published:November 04, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.060

      Highlights

      • Mentorship programs are paramount to success in academic surgery.
      • We created a mentor/mentee pairing program in the Department of Surgery.
      • A majority of respondents would recommend the program.
      • Tangible outcomes may not be the best goal of mentorship programs.
      • Nontangible outcomes include sharing steps to increase productivity and promotion.

      Abstract

      Background

      Mentorship in academic medicine serves to promote career advancement and job satisfaction. This study was to evaluate the initial results of a faculty mentorship program in an academic Department of Surgery.

      Methods

      A faculty mentorship program was initiated in July 2015 with 63 participants. Junior faculty mentees (n = 35) were assigned senior faculty mentors (n = 28). After three years, an electronic survey was administered and the results analyzed.

      Results

      Response rate was 67% (n = 42). 34 (81%) respondents had met with their mentor/mentee at least once. Topics discussed included: research (76%), leadership (52%), work-life balance (45%), and promotion (5%). Mentees endorsed achieving promotion (n = 2), increasing research productivity (n = 2), and obtaining national committee positions (n = 2). 61% of mentors and 53% of mentees felt they benefitted personally from the program. Actionable improvements to the mentorship program were identified including more thoughtful pairing of mentors and mentees with similar research interests.

      Conclusions

      Participants felt the mentorship program was beneficial. Further investigation regarding the optimization of the mentor-mentee pairing is warranted to maximize the benefits from structured mentorship in academic surgery.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nour D.
        The best mentorships help both people grow.
        Harv Bus Rev. 2022;
        • Ries A.
        • Wingard D.
        • Gamst A.
        • et al.
        Measuring faculty retention and success in academic medicine.
        Acad Med. 2012; 87: 1046-1051
        • DeCastro R.
        • Griffith K.A.
        • Ubel P.A.
        • et al.
        Mentoring and the career satisfaction of male and female academic medical faculty.
        Acad Med. 2014; 89: 301-311
        • Sambunjak D.
        • Straus S.E.
        • Marusic A.
        Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 1103-1115
        • Eby L.T.
        • Allen T.D.
        • Evans S.C.
        • et al.
        Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals.
        J Vocat Behav. 2008; 72: 254-267
        • Sambunjak D.
        • Straus S.E.
        • Marusic A.
        A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25: 72-78
        • Lynch K.A.
        • Brown R.F.
        • Steinhagen E.
        • et al.
        Transition from trainee to educator in the operating room: a needs assessment and framework to support junior faculty.
        Am J Surg. 2022; 223: 1112-1119
        • White E.M.
        • Maduka R.C.
        • Ballouz D.
        • et al.
        Surgical research journals - under review: an assessment of diversity among editorial boards and outcomes of peer review.
        Am J Surg. 2021; 222: 1104-1111
        • Cain J.M.
        • Schulkin J.
        • Parisi V.
        • et al.
        Effects of perceptions and mentorship on pursuing a career in academic medicine in obstetrics and gynecology.
        Acad Med. 2001; 76: 628-634
        • Thomas-Maclean R.
        • Hamoline R.
        • Quinlan E.
        • et al.
        Discussing mentorship: an ongoing study for the development of a mentorship program in Saskatchewan.
        Can Fam Physician. 2010; 56: e263-e272
        • Zhang H.
        • Isaac A.
        • Wright E.D.
        • et al.
        Formal mentorship in a surgical residency training program: a prospective interventional study.
        J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 46: 13
        • Kibbe M.R.
        • Pellegrini C.A.
        • Townsend Jr., C.M.
        • et al.
        Characterization of mentorship programs in departments of surgery in the United States.
        JAMA Surg. 2016; 151: 900-906
        • Straus S.E.
        • Johnson M.O.
        • Marquez C.
        • et al.
        Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships: a qualitative study across two academic health centers.
        Acad Med. 2013; 88: 82-89
        • Jackson V.A.
        • Palepu A.
        • Szalacha L.
        • et al.
        Having the right chemistry": a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine.
        Acad Med. 2003; 78: 328-334
        • Mancuso C.A.
        • Berman J.R.
        • Robbins L.
        • et al.
        What mentors tell us about acknowledging effort and sustaining academic research mentoring: a qualitative study.
        J Continuing Educ Health Prof. 2019; 39: 29-35
        • Ullrich L.A.
        • Jordan R.M.
        • Bannon J.
        • et al.
        The mentor match: a new approach to implementing formal mentorship in general surgery residency.
        Am J Surg. 2020; 220: 589-592
        • King K.
        • Turner J.
        • Stewart J.H.
        Current state and need for more black surgeons in academic surgery.
        Am J Surg. 2022; 224: 299-301
        • Mahendran G.N.
        • Walker E.R.
        • Bennett M.
        • et al.
        Suturing the gender gap through sponsorship: the role of sponsorship in female entry and advancement through their surgical careers.
        Am J Surg. 2022; 224: 266-270
        • Rakestraw S.L.
        • Chen H.
        • Corey B.
        • et al.
        Closing the gap: increasing female representation in surgical leadership.
        Am J Surg. 2022; 223: 273-275
        • Zhuge Y.
        • Kaufman J.
        • Simeone D.M.
        • et al.
        Is there still a glass ceiling for women in academic surgery?.
        Ann Surg. 2011; 253: 637-643
        • Taylor S.
        • Iacobelli F.
        • Luedke T.
        • et al.
        Improving health care career pipeline programs for underrepresented students: program design that makes a difference.
        Prog Commun Health Partnersh. 2019; 13: 113-122
        • Beech B.M.
        • Calles-Escandon J.
        • Hairston K.G.
        • et al.
        Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical centers: a systematic review of the literature.
        Acad Med. 2013; 88: 541-549
        • Phitayakorn R.
        • Petrusa E.
        • Hodin R.A.
        Development and initial results of a mandatory department of surgery faculty mentoring pilot program.
        J Surg Res. 2016; 205: 234-237
        • Carney P.R.
        • Ma M.
        • Theiss L.M.
        • et al.
        Introducing the American journal of surgery virtual research mentor: a primer for aspiring surgeon-scientists.
        Am J Surg. 2021; 223: 1015-1016
        • Weber T.
        • Reidel M.
        • Graf S.
        • et al.
        [Careers of women in academic surgery].
        Chirurg. 2005; 76 (discussion 711): 703-711
        • Stephens E.H.
        • Heisler C.A.
        • Temkin S.M.
        • et al.
        The current status of women in surgery: how to affect the future.
        JAMA Surg. 2020; 155: 876-885
        • McCord J.H.
        • McDonald R.
        • Leverson G.
        • et al.
        Motivation to pursue surgical subspecialty training: is there a gender difference?.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205: 698-703
        • Schoel L.J.
        • Fazendin J.
        • Chen H.
        • et al.
        Endocrine surgery is at the forefront of gender diversity.
        Am J Surg. 2021; 221: 86-89
        • Dream S.
        • Olivet M.M.
        • Tanner L.
        • et al.
        Do male chairs of surgery have implicit gender bias in the residency application process?.
        Am J Surg. 2021; 221: 697-700
        • Soklaridis S.
        • Zahn C.
        • Kuper A.
        • et al.
        Men's fear of mentoring in the #MeToo era - what's at stake for academic medicine?.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 2270-2274
        • Keshinro A.
        • Butler P.
        • Fayanju O.
        • et al.
        Examination of intersectionality and the pipeline for black academic surgeons.
        JAMA Surg. 2022; 157: 327-334
        • Santosa K.B.
        • Priest C.R.
        • Oliver J.D.
        • et al.
        Influence of faculty diversity on resident diversity across surgical subspecialties.
        Am J Surg. 2022; 224: 273-281