Advertisement
Original Research Article|Articles in Press

DCIS: When is accelerated partial breast irradiation an option? A meta-analysis on outcomes and eligibility

      Highlights

      • DCIS patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation has comparable outcomes to whole breast irradiation.
      • Better safety outcomes in accelerated partial breast irradiation.
      • Significantly less recurrence rate among DCIS patients classified as Suitable in 2017 ASTRO Consensus.

      Abstract

      Background

      The natural history of DCIS may not be progression to invasive breast cancer (IBC). Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has emerged as an alternative to whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of APBI on DCIS patients.

      Materials and methods

      Eligible studies from 2012 to 2022 were identified in PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials, and ICTRP. A meta-analysis was done comparing recurrence rates, breast-related mortality rates, and adverse events of APBI versus WBRT. A subgroup analysis of 2017 ASTRO Guidelines “Suitable” and “Unsuitable” groups was performed. Forest plots and quantitative analysis were done.

      Results

      Six studies were eligible (3 on APBI versus WBRT, 3 on APBI suitability). All had a low risk of bias and publication bias. The cumulative incidence was the following for APBI and WBRT respectively: IBTR was 5.7% and 6.3% with odds ratio of 1.09, 95% CI [0.84, 1.42], mortality rate was 4.9% and 5.05%, and adverse events was 48.87% and 69.63%. All had no statistical significance between groups. Adverse events were found to favor the APBI arm. Recurrence rate was significantly less in the Suitable group with an odds ratio 2.69, 95% CI [1.56, 4.67], favoring it over the Unsuitable group.

      Conclusion

      APBI was comparable to WBRT in terms of recurrence rate, breast cancer-related mortality rate, and adverse events. APBI was not inferior to WBRT and showed better safety in terms of skin toxicity. Patients classified as suitable for APBI had significantly lesser recurrence rate.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ryser M.D.
        • Weaver D.L.
        • Zhao F.
        • et al.
        Cancer outcomes in DCIS patients without locoregional treatment.
        JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 13; 111: 952-960https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy220
        • Lips E.H.
        • Kumar T.
        • Megalios A.
        • et al.
        Genomic analysis defines clonal relationships of ductal carcinoma in situ and recurrent invasive breast cancer.
        Nat Genet. 2022 Jun 9; 54: 850-860https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01082-3
        • Wilson G.M.
        • Dinh P.
        • Pathmanathan N.
        • Graham J.D.
        Ductal carcinoma in situ: molecular changes accompanying disease progression.
        J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2022 May 14; 27: 101-131https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-022-09517-7
        • Erbas B.
        • Provenzano E.
        • Armes J.
        • Gertig D.
        The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a Review.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 May 1; 97: 135-144https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9101-z
        • Vicini F.A.
        • Cecchini R.S.
        • White J.R.
        • et al.
        Long-term primary results of accelerated partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer: a randomised, phase 3, equivalence trial.
        Lancet. 2019; 394: 2155-2164https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32514-0
        • Mitchell K.B.
        • Kuerer H.
        Ductal carcinoma in situ: treatment update and current trends.
        Curr Oncol Rep. 2015; 17https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-015-0473-x
        • Shah C.
        • Vicini F.
        • Shaitelman S.F.
        • et al.
        The American brachytherapy society consensus statement for Accelerated Partial-breast irradiation.
        Brachytherapy. 2018; 17: 154-170https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2017.09.004
        • Correa C.
        • Harris E.E.
        • Leonardi M.C.
        • et al.
        Accelerated partial breast irradiation: executive summary for the update of an ASTRO evidence-based consensus statement.
        Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017; 7: 73-79https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2016.09.007
        • Ott O.J.
        • Strnad V.
        • Hildebrandt G.
        • et al.
        GEC-ESTRO Multicenter Phase 3-trial: accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy versus external beam whole breast irradiation: early toxicity and patient compliance.
        Radiother Oncol. 2016; 120: 119-123https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.019
        • Gradishar W.J.
        • Moran M.S.
        • Abraham J.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2022 Jun; 20: 691-722https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030
        • Jawad M.S.
        • Shah C.
        • Wilkinson J.B.
        • et al.
        Seven-year outcomes following accelerated partial breast irradiation stratified by Astro Consensus Groupings.
        Am J Clin Oncol. 2017; 40: 483-489https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000190
        • Livi L.
        • Meattini I.
        • Marrazzo L.
        • et al.
        Accelerated partial breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus whole breast irradiation: 5-year survival analysis of a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.
        Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51: 451-463https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.013
        • Shah S.
        • Kyrillos A.
        • Kuchta K.
        • et al.
        A single institution retrospective comparison study of Locoregional recurrence after accelerated partial breast irradiation using external beam fractionation compared with whole breast irradiation with 8 years of follow-up.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 24: 2935-2942https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5953-9
        • Chin C.
        • Hirji S.
        • Onishi M.
        • et al.
        A single-institution experience in the preoperative selection of DCIS patients for IORT USING THE ASTRO consensus guidelines.
        Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019; 4: 253-260https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.11.004
        • Leonardi M.C.
        • Corrao G.
        • Frassoni S.
        • et al.
        Ductal carcinoma in situ and intraoperative partial breast irradiation: who are the best candidates? long-term outcome of a single institution series.
        Radiother Oncol. 2019; 133: 68-76https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.030
        • Mills M.N.
        • Russo N.W.
        • Nanda R.H.
        • et al.
        Management of ductal carcinoma in situ with accelerated partial breast irradiation brachytherapy: implications for guideline expansion.
        Brachytherapy. 2021; 20: 345-352https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.11.002
        • Keisch M.
        • Vicini F.
        • Beitsch P.
        • et al.
        American Society of Breast Surgeons mammosite radiation therapy system registry trial: ductal carcinoma-in-situ subset analysis—4-year data in 194 treated lesions.
        Am J Surg. 2009 Oct; 198: 505-507https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.013
        • Abbott A.M.
        • Portschy P.R.
        • Lee C.
        • et al.
        Prospective multicenter trial evaluating balloon-catheter partial-breast irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Nov 1; 87: 494-498https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.2056
        • McHaffie D.R.
        • Patel R.R.
        • Adkison J.B.
        • Das R.K.
        • Geye H.M.
        • Cannon G.M.
        Outcomes after accelerated partial breast irradiation in patients with Astro consensus statement cautionary features.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Sep 1; 81: 46-51https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.011
        • Rivera R.
        • Banks A.
        • Casillas-Lopez A.
        • et al.
        Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
        Breast J. 2015; 22: 63-74https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12516
        • Becherini C.
        • Meattini I.
        • Livi L.
        • et al.
        External accelerated partial breast irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term follow-up from a phase 3 randomized trial.
        Tumori. 2018 Jun 26; 105: 205-209https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891618811278
        • Lei R.Y.
        • Leonard C.E.
        • Howell K.T.
        • et al.
        Disease control efficacy of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI).
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Oct 1; 87https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.506
        • Elshof L.E.
        • Tryfonidis K.
        • Slaets L.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ – the LORD study.
        Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51: 1497-1510https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.008
        • Lopez-Garcia M.A.
        • Geyer F.C.
        • Lacroix-Triki M.
        • Marchió C.
        • Reis-Filho J.S.
        Breast cancer precursors revisited: molecular features and progression pathways.
        Histopathology. 2010 Aug; 57: 171-192https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03568.x
        • Lakhani S.R.
        • Audretsch W.
        • Cleton-Jensen A.-M.
        • et al.
        The management of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). is LCIS the same as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?.
        Eur J Cancer. 2006 Sep; 42: 2205-2211https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.03.019
        • Van de Vijver M.J.
        • Peterse H.
        The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: pathological diagnosis – problems with existing classifications.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2003; 5https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr629
        • Hernandez L.
        • Wilkerson P.M.
        • Lambros M.B.
        • et al.
        Genomic and mutational profiling of ductal carcinomas in situ and matched adjacent invasive breast cancers reveals intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity and Clonal Selection.
        J Pathol. 2012 May 21; 227: 42-52https://doi.org/10.1002/path.3990
        • Bijker N.
        • Peterse J.L.
        • Duchateau L.
        • et al.
        Histological type and marker expression of the primary tumour compared with its local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ.
        Br J Cancer. 2001 Feb; 84: 539-544https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1618
        • Solin L.J.
        • Gray R.
        • Hughes L.L.
        • et al.
        Surgical excision without radiation for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: 12-year results from the ECOG-ACRIN E5194 study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 20; 33: 3938-3944https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8588
        • McCormick B.
        • Winter K.
        • Hudis C.
        • et al.
        RTOG 9804: a prospective randomized trial for good-risk ductal carcinoma in situ comparing radiotherapy with observation.
        J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1; 33: 709-715https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9029