Research Article| Volume 32, ISSUE 3, P401-404, June 1936

Tumor clinic and pathologist

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      The pathologist's duties toward the Tumor Clinic are to aid in diagnosis, to evaluate various types of treatment and to encourage and direct research. The close association of pathologist and clinician made possible by the Tumor Clinic is of mutual benefit.
      Various methods of obtaining biopsy specimens and preparing them for microscopic study are discussed. The danger of biopsy is considered to be minimal. The diagnostic import of the biopsy is stressed; and the grading of neoplasms histologically, with reference to prognosis and to radiosensitivity is analyzed briefly.
      The serological diagnosis of malignancy seems to be of little practical value. At present, it is an experimental field which possibly may prove productive.
      The importance of necropsy in the study of neoplastic disease is emphasized.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • McGraw A.B.
        • Hartman F.W.
        Present status of the biopsy.
        Jour. Am. Med. Assn. 1933; 101 (Oct. 14): 1205
        • Guequierre J.P.
        • Weidman F.D.
        High frequency currents in performing biopsies.
        Jour. Am. Med. Assn. 1934; 103 (Dec. 1): 1693
        • Bloodgood J.C.
        Am. Jour. Surg. 1934; 24 (May): 331
        • Martin H.E.
        • Ellis E.B.
        Biopsy by needle puncture and aspiration.
        Ann. Surg. 1930; 92: 169
        • Martin H.E.
        • Ellis E.B.
        Aspiration biopsy.
        Surg. Gynec. and Obst. 1934; 59 (Oct.): 578
        • Coley B.L.
        • Sharp G.S.
        • Ellis E.B.
        Diagnosis of bone tumors by aspiration.
        Am. Jour. Surg. 1931; 13 (Aug.): 215
        • Stewart F.W.
        The diagnosis of tumors by aspiration.
        Am. Jour. Path. 1933; 9 (Sept.): 801
        • Hoffman W.J.
        Punch biopsy in tumor diagnosis.
        Surg. Gyn. and Obst. 1933; 56 (April): 829
        • Lowsley O.S.
        A new device for securing biopsy specimens.
        Jour. Urol. 1935; 33 (April): 417
        • Von Haam E.
        The importance of biopsy in the diagnosis of cancer.
        New Orleans Med. and Surg. Jour. 1934; 87 (Sept.): 153
        • Wood F.C.
        Diagnostic incision of tumors.
        Jour. Am. Med. Assn. 1919; 73 (Sept. 6): 764
        • Guequierre J.P.
        • Weidman F.D.
        High frequency currents in performing biopsies.
        Jour. Am. Med. Assn. 1934; 103 (Discussion by F. D. Weidman following) (Dec. 1): 1693
        • Bloodgood J.C.
        Biopsy in breast lesions.
        Ann. Surg. 1935; 102 (Aug.): 239
        • Broders A.C.
        Squamous cell epithelioma of the lip.
        Jour. Am. Med. Assn. 1920; 74 (March 6): 656
        • Broders A.C.
        Carcinoma, grading and practical application.
        Arch. Path. 1926; 2 (Sept.): 376
        • Hueper W.C.
        Carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
        Arch. Path. 1928; 6 (Dec.): 1064
        • Gates O.
        • Warren S.
        The grading of epidermoid carcinoma.
        Surg. Gynec. and Obst. 1934; 58 (June): 962
        • Hellwig C.A.
        The scientific basis of biopsy in tumors.
        Arch. Path. 1932; 14 (Oct.): 517
        • Te Linde R.W.
        Cancer-like lesions of the uterine cervix.
        Jour. Am. Med. Assn. 1933; 101 (Oct. 14): 1211
        • MacFarland J.
        • Clark J.H.
        • Friedman M.
        Experiences with Gruskin skin test for the diagnosis of cancer.
        Jour. Lab. Clin. Med. 1935; 20 (Feb.): 468
        • Friedl F.
        • Kulka E.
        Experience with the carcinoma reaction of Fuchs.
        Zentralbl. f. Gynäk. 1934; 58 (Dec. 8): 2896
        • Lundy H.W.
        Complement fixation reactions in carcinoma.
        Jour. Lab. Clin. Med. 1935; 20 (June): 923