Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 172, ISSUE 5, P454-458, November 1996

Download started.

Ok

Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Background

      Because iatrogenic colonic perforation is uncommon, surgical management of this complication has been based on the civilian trauma experience. In this study, we determine the incidence, clinical presentation, and management of colonic perforations resulting from colonoscopy or barium enema.

      Patients and Methods

      The medical records of all patients with colorectal perforations due to barium enema or colonoscopy seen over a 5-year period were reviewed.

      Results

      Twenty-one patients, 12 males and 9 females aged 66 ± 16 years, undergoing evaluation for polyps and bleeding (11), diverticulosis (4), diarrhea (2), or miscellaneous indications (4) sustained colonic perforation from colonoscopy (18; 0.20%) or barium enema (3; 0.10%). Abdominal pain, 66% (13), and fever, 24% (5), were the most frequent symptoms encountered and extraluminal air, 67% (14), the most common radiologic finding. The site of perforation was the rectosigmoid in 62% (13) of patients.
      Eighteen patients underwent surgery; 11 within 24 hours (group I) and 7 patients within 6.0 ± 4 days (group II). Fifty percent (9 of 18) had primary repair or resection with anastomosis without mortality. Of the 6 patients initially treated nonoperatively, 3 subsequently underwent surgery. Both deaths, one in group I and one in group II, occurred in patients who had colonic diversion for perforation following colonoscopy.

      Conclusion

      We conclude that in the absence of significant contamination either primary repair or resection and anastomosis can be performed with acceptable morbidity for iatrogenic perfortions of the colon.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hakim NS
        • Sarr MG
        • Bender CE
        • Nivatvongs S
        Management of barium enema-induced colorectal perforation.
        Am Surg. 1992; 58: 673-676
        • Hall C
        • Dorricott NJ
        • Donavan IA
        • Neoptolemos JP
        Colon perforation during colonoscopy: surgical versus conservative management”.
        Br J Surg. 1991; 78: 542-544
        • Macrae FA
        • Tan KG
        • Williams CB
        Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies.
        Gut. 1983; 24: 376-383
        • Woodhall JP
        • Oshner A
        The management of perforating injuries of the colon and rectum in civilian practice.
        Surgery. 1951; 29: 305-320
        • Kiser JL
        • Spratt JS
        • Johnson CA
        Colon perforations occurring during sigmoidoscopic examinations and barium enemas.
        Missouri Med. 1968; 65: 969-974
        • Brynitz S
        • Kjaergardh Strucmann J
        Perforations from colonoscopy during diagnosis and therapy of polyps.
        Ann Chir Gynecol. 1986; 75: 142-150
        • Nelson RL
        • Abcarian H
        • Prasad ML
        Iatrogenic perforation of the colon and rectum.
        Dis Colon Rect. 1982; 25: 305-308
        • Christie JP
        • Marrazzo J
        ‘Mini-perforation’ of the colon: not all postpolypectomy perforations require laparotomy.
        Dis Colon Rect. 1991; 34: 132-135
        • Han SY
        • Tishler JM
        Perforation of the colon above the peritoneal reflection during the barium-enema examination.
        Radiology. 1982; 144: 253-255
        • Vincent M
        • Smith LE
        Management of perforations due to colonoscopy.
        Dis Colon Rect. 1983; 6: 61-63
        • Carpio G
        • Albu E
        • Gumbs MA
        • Gerst PH
        Management of colonic perforation after colonoscopy: report of three cases.
        Dis Colon Rect. 1989; 32: 624-626
        • Soon JC
        • Shang JS
        • Min Yih Goh P
        • Rauff A
        Perforation of the large bowel during colonoscopy in Singapore.
        Am Surg. 1990; 56: 285-288
        • Gelfand DW
        Complications of gastrointestinal radiologic procedures: complications of routine fluoroscopic studies.
        Gostrointes Radiol. 1980; 5: 293-315
        • Williams SM
        • Harned RK
        Recognition and prevention of barium enema complications.
        Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 1991; 20: 123-151
        • Nahrwold DL
        • Isch JH
        • Benner DA
        • Miller RE
        Effect of fluid administration and operation on the mortality rate in barium peritonitis.
        Surgery. 1971; 70: 778-781
        • Herrington JL
        Barium granuloma within the peritoneal cavity: ureteral obstruction 7 years after barium enema and colonic perforation.
        Ann Surg. 1966; 164: 162-166
        • Kozarek RA
        • Earnest DL
        • Silverstein ME
        • Smith RG
        Air pressure induced colon injury during diagnostic colonoscopy.
        Gastroenterology. 1980; 78: 7-14
        • Kavin H
        • Simicrope F
        • Eser AH
        Management of perforation of the colon at colonoscopy.
        Am J Gastroent. 1992; 87: 161-167
        • Jeffries RB
        • Federle MP
        • Wall S
        Value of computed tomography in detecting occult gastrointestinal perforation.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1983; 7: 825-827
        • Pannish JF
        Management of perforations with polypoid lesions of the colon: current concepts and controversies.
        Am J Gostroent. 1979; 71: 315-324